Procrustes analysis
d = procrustes(X,Y)
[d,Z] = procrustes(X,Y)
[d,Z,transform] = procrustes(X,Y)
[...] = procrustes(...,'scaling',flag)
[...] = procrustes(...,'reflection',flag)
d = procrustes(X,Y) determines
a linear transformation (translation, reflection, orthogonal rotation,
and scaling) of the points in matrix Y to best
conform them to the points in matrix X. The goodness-of-fit
criterion is the sum of squared errors. procrustes returns
the minimized value of this dissimilarity measure in d. d is
standardized by a measure of the scale of X, given
by:
sum(sum((X-repmat(mean(X,1),size(X,1),1)).^2,1))
That is, the sum of squared elements of a centered version of X.
However, if X comprises repetitions of the same
point, the sum of squared errors is not standardized.
X and Y must have the
same number of points (rows), and procrustes matches Y(i) to X(i).
Points in Y can have smaller dimension (number
of columns) than those in X. In this case, procrustes adds
columns of zeros to Y as necessary.
[d,Z] = procrustes(X,Y) also
returns the transformed Y values.
[d,Z,transform] = procrustes(X,Y) also
returns the transformation that maps Y to Z. transform is
a structure array with fields:
c — Translation component
T — Orthogonal rotation
and reflection component
b — Scale component
That is:
c = transform.c; T = transform.T; b = transform.b; Z = b*Y*T + c;
[...] = procrustes(...,'scaling',,
when flag)flag is false,
allows you to compute the transformation without a scale component
(that is, with b equal to 1).
The default flag is true.
[...] = procrustes(...,'reflection',,
when flag)flag is false,
allows you to compute the transformation without a reflection component
(that is, with det(T) equal to 1).
The default flag is 'best',
which computes the best-fitting transformation, whether or not it
includes a reflection component. A flag of true forces
the transformation to be computed with a reflection component (that
is, with det(T) equal to -1)
[1] Kendall, David G. “A Survey of the Statistical Theory of Shape.” Statistical Science. Vol. 4, No. 2, 1989, pp. 87–99.
[2] Bookstein, Fred L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[3] Seber, G. A. F. Multivariate Observations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1984.