Hydraulic resistance in pipe bend
Local Hydraulic Resistances

The Pipe Bend block represents a pipe bend as a local hydraulic resistance. The pressure loss in the bend is assumed to consist of
Loss in the straight pipe
Loss due to curvature
The loss in a straight pipe is simulated with the Hydraulic Resistive Tube block. The loss due to curvature is simulated with the Local Resistance block, and the pressure loss coefficient is determined in accordance with the Crane Co. recommendations (see [1], p. A-29). The flow regime is checked in the underlying Local Resistance block by comparing the Reynolds number to the specified critical Reynolds number value.
The pressure loss due to curvature for turbulent flow regime is determined according to the following formula:
where
q | Flow rate |
p | Pressure loss |
K | Pressure loss coefficient |
A | Bend cross-sectional area |
| ρ | Fluid density |
For laminar flow regime, the formula for pressure loss computation is modified, as described in the reference documentation for the Local Resistance block.
The pressure loss coefficient is determined according to recommendation provided in [1]:
where
Kd | Base friction factor coefficient |
Kr | Correction coefficient accounting for the bend curvature |
Kα | Correction coefficient accounting for the bend angle |
The base friction factor coefficient is determined according to the following table.

Note
Friction factors for pipes with diameters greater than 525 mm are determined by extrapolation.
The correction coefficient accounting for the bend curvature is determined according to the next table.

The bend curvature relative radius is calculated as
r = bend radius / pipe
diameter
Note
For pipes with the bend curvature relative radius value outside
the range of 1 > r > 24, correction
coefficients are determined by extrapolation.
Correction for non-90o bends is performed with the empirical formula (see [2], Fig. 4.6):
where
| α | Bend angle in degrees (0 ≤ α ≤ 180) |

Connections A and B are conserving hydraulic ports associated with the block inlet and outlet, respectively.
The block positive direction is from port A to port B. This means that the flow rate is positive if fluid flows from A to B, and the pressure differential is determined as .
Warning
The formulas used in the Pipe Bend block are
very approximate, especially in the laminar and transient flow regions.
For more accurate results, use a combination of the Local Resistance block
with a table-specified K=f(Re) relationship
and the Hydraulic Resistive Tube block.
Fluid inertia and wall compliance are not taken into account.
The bend is assumed to be made of a clean commercial steel pipe.
The internal diameter of the pipe. The default value is 0.01 m.
The radius of the bend. The default value is 0.04 m.
The angle of the bend. The value must be in the range between
0 and 180 degrees. The default value is 90 deg.
Roughness height on the pipe internal surface. The parameter
is typically provided in data sheets or manufacturer's catalogs. The
default value is 1.5e-5 m, which corresponds to
drawn tubing.
The maximum Reynolds number for laminar flow. The value of the
parameter depends on the orifice geometrical profile. You can find
recommendations on the parameter value in hydraulics textbooks. The
default value is 350.
Dynamic compressibility setting. Select On to
make the fluid density dependent on pressure and temperature. Select Off to
treat the fluid density as a constant. Dynamic compressibility impacts
the transient response of the fluid at small time scales and can slow
down simulation.
Gauge pressure in the pipe bend at time zero. The default value
is 0 Pa.
Parameters determined by the type of working fluid:
Fluid density
Fluid kinematic viscosity
Use the Hydraulic Fluid block or the Custom Hydraulic Fluid block to specify the fluid properties.
The block has the following ports:
AHydraulic conserving port associated with the bend inlet.
BHydraulic conserving port associated with the bend outlet.
[1] Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe, Crane Valves North America, Technical Paper No. 410M
[2] George R. Keller, Hydraulic System Analysis, Published by the Editors of Hydraulics & Pneumatics Magazine, 1970
Elbow | Gradual Area Change | Hydraulic Resistive Tube | Local Resistance | Sudden Area Change | T-junction