vectorization of for loop

1 view (last 30 days)
Jip
Jip on 10 Dec 2013
Edited: Matt J on 10 Dec 2013
Hi,
I made a 2d matrix with two for loops:
for k = 1:32
for l = 1:32
P_new(l,k) = P_old(l) + (LODF(l,k) * P_old(k));
end
end
P_old is here a 32 x 1 matrix and LODF is a 32 x 32 matrix which is already computed. How can I vectorize this code to avoid the for loops? Thanks in advance.

Accepted Answer

Matt J
Matt J on 10 Dec 2013
P_new= bsxfun(@times, LODF, P_old.');
P_new= bsxfun(@plus, P_new,P_old);
  2 Comments
Jip
Jip on 10 Dec 2013
Edited: Matt J on 10 Dec 2013
Although this code avoids the for loops, it is not faster, which is my purpose. Actually the code is much slower. Any other suggestions?
Matt J
Matt J on 10 Dec 2013
Edited: Matt J on 10 Dec 2013
For 32x32 data, I wouldn't be surprised if the for-loop was the fastest approach. For larger sizes, however, the vectorized approach will start to show superior performance, e.g.,
N=3200;
LODF=rand(N); P_old=rand(N,1);
tic;
P_new=zeros(size(LODF));
for k = 1:N
for l = 1:N
P_new(l,k) = P_old(l) + (LODF(l,k) * P_old(k));
end
end
toc;
%Elapsed time is 0.102201 seconds.
tic;
P_new= bsxfun(@times, LODF, P_old.');
P_new= bsxfun(@plus, P_new,P_old);
toc
%Elapsed time is 0.043591 seconds.
If you're not happy with the speed of your code, you should show us the slow part in its entirety. The small part you've shown is pretty fast, in and of itself.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (2)

Jos (10584)
Jos (10584) on 10 Dec 2013
for loops are pretty fast when you use pre-allocation
P_new = zeros(32,32) ;
for k = 1:32
for l = 1:32
P_new(l,k) = P_old(l) + (LODF(l,k) * P_old(k));
end
end

Jip
Jip on 10 Dec 2013
Yes I know, I already did that.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!